<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: London 2012 Brand Backlash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geekfriendly.org/blog/06/london-2012-brand-backlash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geekfriendly.org/blog/06/london-2012-brand-backlash/</link>
	<description>Posting in spurts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 16:04:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alfred</title>
		<link>http://geekfriendly.org/blog/06/london-2012-brand-backlash/comment-page-1/#comment-33956</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfriendly.org/blog/06/london-2012-brand-backlash/#comment-33956</guid>
		<description>Yikes... what is this? Modern art? 1990&#039;s graffiti?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes&#8230; what is this? Modern art? 1990&#8217;s graffiti?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tellem</title>
		<link>http://geekfriendly.org/blog/06/london-2012-brand-backlash/comment-page-1/#comment-26085</link>
		<dc:creator>tellem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfriendly.org/blog/06/london-2012-brand-backlash/#comment-26085</guid>
		<description>Saved by The Bell called n said they needed their their script n colors to air the re-runs. lol I cant bellieve they spent so much money on something my little brother could have done and the color scheme is atrocious. If they decide to keep this then we really are regressing into the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saved by The Bell called n said they needed their their script n colors to air the re-runs. lol I cant bellieve they spent so much money on something my little brother could have done and the color scheme is atrocious. If they decide to keep this then we really are regressing into the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://geekfriendly.org/blog/06/london-2012-brand-backlash/comment-page-1/#comment-23006</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekfriendly.org/blog/06/london-2012-brand-backlash/#comment-23006</guid>
		<description>It has to go, there is no-one on the planet that does not think it looks like the simpsons siblings enjoying oral.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has to go, there is no-one on the planet that does not think it looks like the simpsons siblings enjoying oral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
